Free Web Hosting | free host | Free Web Space | BlueHost Review
icon

This page describes a particular view of non-locality, particle-wave duality and Dark energy. Keep in mind that this view is nothing more than philosophical musings with a few measurements thrown in and should be read with an open mind. However, since there has been no satisfactory explanation to any of these phenomena, I present these as being just as possible as any other theory.
Steven R. Grimm


"Newton thought that light was made up of particles, but then it was discovered, as we have seen here, that it behaves like a wave. Later however (in the beginning of the twentieth century), it was found that light did indeed sometimes behave like a particle. Now we have given up. We say: "It is like neither". There is one lucky break, however--electrons behave just like light. The quantum behavior of atomic objects (electrons, protons, neutrons, photons and so on) is the same for all, they are all "particle-waves", or whatever you want to call them. So what we learn about the properties of electrons (which we shall use for our examples) will apply also to all "particles", including photons of light." : Richard Feynman; 1963 " The Feynman Lectures on Physics.


Assuming the reality of the Anti-magnetic charge state of matter we first consider the proposed radius of an electron.
Electron radius (classical); ro=2.8179*10 ^(-13) cm or 2.8179*10^(-15) m. Empirical evidence by independent researchers have suggested a 'mirror image' dimensional charge associated with subatomic particles and we will call this,"anti-magnetic charge" for this explanation. It can be shown through experiments that this is a physical reciprocal state of normal matter which we perceive as reality. Taken a step further, it can be also shown that a reciprocal dimensionality can exist as an undetected orthogonal property of 'normal' matter states. In other words, each matter state ( particle) can have an inverse property associated with it as it is necessary to exist: One completes the other. To further illustrate the implications of inverse orthogonals, consider the inverse size of (ro), the above mentioned electron. To calculate the inverse of 2.8179*10^(-13)cm, one will result in a radius of approximately 202,508,602,884.1565 miles. Essentially 202 and half billion miles. That is to say that every electron has a mirror dimensional orthogonal in an anti-magnetic charge state that is normally not detected. It is considered by most as background noise and is compensated for by filtering or mathematically zeroing out. This can also be considered zero-point energy or dark energy/matter. We would indeed be in a sea of the anti-magnetic energy as all energetic "mirror" fields would overlap infinite times, or as many times as there are particles in the universe.

This brings up two other points. The non locality mystery and Young's dual slit experiment. A third point that won't be discussed at length is the energy implications. If we also consider the inverse of energy per electron charge (e) then we arrive at 6.25*10^18 (dark energy) per electron charge. (This has yet to be worked out) However, it has been stated by several others that this energy is at an astronomical abundance. "Physicists John Wheeler and Richard Feynman calculated that there is enough such energy in the vacuum inside a single light bulb to boil all the world's oceans."

First implication:
The Dual slit experiment can be explained if one considers that the electron really does interfere with itself. This cannot be proven in standard experiments and remains a mystery of the wave/particle duality. However, if one includes the "undetected" anti-magnetic wave as the counterpart to the electron under test, then it is logical to assume that naturally there will be an interference pattern observed on the target plate. The electron's wave property passes through a single slit while the anti-magnetic property passes through the other slit. The anti-magnetic wave is not detected as it is not being "looked for" and, since it of the same phase as the original electron, the result is wavefront interference patterns. The dimensional properties are opposite each other and actually would be causal to interference. The phase remains the same but "polarity" is opposite to each other; they are opponent forces.
Next implication:
Non locality, or "Spooky action at a distance" : Instantaneous information exchange over any distance without loss. This has been proven with the Aspect experiment but only at a limited range. Several miles of distance separated the particles under test, but theory suggests that distance is inconsequential. The proposal here brings into account the electron radius and it's anti-magnetic counterpart as mentioned above. The distance of the two hundred and two and a half billion miles is what's important. One can imagine a "photon" that has collided with another particle to cause a split, generating an electron and a positron traveling now in opposite directions. However, the inverse anti-magnetic 'field' of both particles (assuming particles at this point), have enveloped many billions of miles and also envelope each other.
The nature of quantum waves provides for instantaneous communication of it's wave state; e.g. it's wave topology. What happens at one part of the wave happens to all parts. Assuming that the ejected particles (electron and positron) are quantumly entangled (since originating from a single source), then the inverse wave is also entangled but covering billions of miles at an instant. When the polarity of the test particle is changed (due to the experiment), this is reflected in the inverse wave and appears to change the polarity of the other test particle.....not due to the original particle being changed but by the inverse wave in instant communication with it's entangled counterpart.
So indeed many billions of miles can separate the particles under test, and they both will exhibit a mirror change of each other at the instant one of them is detected (changed), because of the inverse anti magnetic property of that particular particle.
This can actually get complex but it doesn't need to. Perhaps a simpler explanation is needed here with a diagram of sorts. Essentially, due to the inverse property of the anti magnetic wave of a "normal" electron, we can demonstrate how and why there appears to be a wave/particle duality and how the appearance of faster than light communication can exist between entangled pairs of particles. Also, the energy factor brought in by the inverse anti magnetic wave property should seriously be considered as it may be an explanation for dark energy/matter.
Steven R. Grimm

Feynman quote: http://www.angelfire.com/wi/HolisticScience/electron.html
Electron radius: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ElectronRadius.html
Zero point Energy:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/farout/story/0,13028,999278,00.html
Electron charge:
http://library.thinkquest.org/28032/cgi-bin/frames.cgi?src=lessons0102