Some observations that I've made lately about the project and about the
overall operation of QB transistors.
5-08-07
One temporary model of the input sensors connected to the QB processor
( or Pan-matrix, whichever) consisted of 9 light detecting cells in a
3x3 matrix. These are not photocells as in the cadmium sulfide variety
but are photo-detectors used in detecting lasers, infrared and ambient
light similar to those found in digital cameras to adjust the contrast.
I think the first Corey used these types of elements but only one per
"eye" was used. This Corey model uses a multitude of these devices for
the optics. Below is a sketch of how the 3x3 matrix looks. Each black
square connected to the transistor indicates the optic sensor with a
negative connection to the power supply. In this particular model the
feature that strikes me the most is the extreme low current draw.
Referring to the sketch, you see 3 boxes designated as "r". These are 1
meg-ohm (or higher) resistors that connect from a 4066 cmos quad
bi-lateral switch to the positive connection. This positive
connection serves a couple of different purposes. First it acts to
convert the negative output of the Base of the transistor to a positive
charge which is fed-back to the top transistors. This is the reciprocal
voltage of the negative output and acts as a control to the rest of the
matrix. It helps setup the opposing polarity for the network to
properly work. The positive output is also the interface to other
electronics; in this case, to the inputs of the micro-controller that
controls the motors. I found using the resistors was the most
efficient way to reverse the polarity without resorting to inverters or
other extra components.
Because of the positive charge on the resistors there is a slight
forward bias to the transistors which at first glance seems to be
something we don't want to do, due to the potential current draw.
However, I believe because of the non-linear nature of the transistors
and the field effect produced by the opposing charges, the current draw
is held at a minimum. This particular circuit, on average only drew
between 4 to 6 micro-amps depending on the amount of light on the
detectors. For this to be a functioning circuit drawing this minute
current is nothing short of astonishing in my opinion.
An interesting side note about this circuit is the reciprocal
interaction of charges at the output and the implication it holds. As
the light increases in amplitude on the detectors, the positive charge
on the output decreases in proportion while the negative charge
increases in proportion. Also, the amperage increases with the higher
amplitude light.
This brings to mind a property of least energy in a network. It seems
that in order to conserve energy, the machine would have a tendency to
seek dark areas and avoid lighted areas. This would minimize the
positive charge drawn on the system and maximize the negative charge
resulting in conserving the charge on the battery. The machine, left to
it's own devices would be more of a "photophobe" or
"Nocturnaphore"....if there is such a thing.
I performed an interesting experiment last week while working on the QB
processor. The 3x3 matrix was left connected to it's battery for about
3 days in nominal ambient light. As I stated before there was about a 4
to 6 micro-amp current draw on the circuit and this stayed consistent
throughout the experiment. The interesting observation I made was much
like previous experiments I've performed......there was no noticeable
drop in battery voltage over the time period. Since technically
we were
connecting 3 one meg-ohm resistors between negative and positive
battery and slightly forward biasing the transistors, there should have
been a significantly higher current draw and voltage drop. Here's the
question....what if there is a more substantial voltage drop on average
but the loss in battery energy is being replenished (?)
It is still undecided how electrons regain energy after changing orbits
or states. We know that when an electron drops to a lower level it
loses a quantum of energy...a photon; and it will absorb a photon to
jump to a higher orbit. But no one knows where the "extra" energy comes
from. What if the electrons are deriving their energy from the Zero
point field? I believe this has been suggested before, probably by
Puthof. On a small enough scale, about where we're at, the recharging
of the negative pole may be possible due to this tapping of ZPE. It
seems in this experiment (and in previous ones), that there is a
balancing act going on between what energy the circuit uses and how
much is being generated back into the system. Once the system starts to
draw current beyond the recharging point, the balance is no longer
detected and the battery will start to lose voltage as would be
normally expected. This recharging via ZPE ( if that is what it is)
seems to be a passive type of energy and very easy to "swamp" due to
the inefficiencies of electronic circuits.
I believe if properly designed, a whole circuit could be produced that
would take advantage of this recharging energy resulting in an era of
machines using next to nothing in energy consumption. This may be
a feature worth looking into.
Later I will talk about the reciprocal voltages in the circuit and how
they affect each other via the QB circuit.......it's really interesting.
FIG 1.
The 4066 switch is used to
connect the resistors to the matrix. When the control wire is active a
set of electronic relay type switches are activated and connect the
resistors to the matrix. In between control activations, the
transistors compute their potential output. When the control activates
the switches, the signals travel through the circuit to the outputs
which are connected in parallel to the resistors. There is a reason why
the circuit looks the way it does and why it's wiring is the way it is.
The processor being built is an 8x8 matrix which has the potential to
connect 64 sensors. The circuit demonstrates self-organization and
local energy wells (stable energy states).
